![]() |
'What's
the name of that little place over there, where
we don't want to get our hands
dirty with electoral politics?'
|
There’s a
pretty consistent message coming out of the Shadow Cabinet on standing for
elections in Northern Ireland. I find that disturbing given that there’s still a process going on: a process that is moving more slowly than Northern Ireland members
expected, possibly because all the other participants (NEC, led by Vernon
Coaker; Irish Labour Party; and SDLP) have no real interest in concluding it.
To use Ed Miliband’s words from last week, I am beginning to doubt that leading
Party members and their advisers are the ‘honest brokers’ we had anticipated
and that, as Party members, we have the right to expect.
In addition
to Miliband’s comments last week, on 5th October Vernon Coaker, the Shadow Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, tweeted:
On contesting elections in NI: it's sensitive.
Ed right to say he's wary. Labour's National Executive continuing discussions
on issue
And then,
this week, Ed Balls visited Northern Ireland to discuss economic policy with
the CBI. The BBC reported:
Mr Balls, who was accompanying Labour's Northern Ireland spokesman Vernon
Coaker on his visit to Stormont, said the party was still considering the matter through
an internal process.
However, Mr Balls pointed out that the party has no tradition of candidates standing in
Northern Ireland and said things had not worked out very well for David Cameron when
he had interfered in local party politics.
This ignored
the fact that the Tories had an electoral pact with the UUP (although they now
stand as a separate party). And if Labour were planning an electoral pact with
the SDLP (which we are not) then it would be equally disastrous, perpetuating the
same old divisive approach to politics.
Ed Balls was
also reported in the Newsletter today as having sidestepped the issue, rather
unhelpfully describing himself as a unionist in the process – when Labour in
Northern Ireland has to struggle to get it into people’s heads that we are a
cross community party and not the Unionist alternative to the SDLP. Balls was
quoted as saying:
We are strongly committed to working closely with the region and with the [Stormont]
executive, and I think a Labour government is strongly committed to the Union but I
am not sure that necessarily translates into party political organisation here for us.... I
think you have to be quite careful about stepping into decades of political history and
suddenly deciding to do things a different way.
So the
message is: we’re happy to come over here, tell people what we think is good
for Northern Ireland and work with parties who have nothing to do with the
Labour movement, but in order to be seen as even-handed we don’t want to allow
our local members to get involved in politics and put our views to the
electorate.
Anyone who
thinks it’s colonialist for Labour to stand for election in Northern Ireland needs
to think very seriously about what it is they are doing now.

3 comments:
No, Ed Balls, it's not a question of suddenly deciding to do things a different way, it's a question of doing things the normal way, injecting some mainstream, non-sectarian, quality-of-life politics into a society half-paralysed by decades of territorial and religious squabbling.
Nick, you are right but I do think Labour in NI is fighting a losing battle.
BTW there's been a lot more discussion of this post on Facebook.
Post a Comment